This is how your work will be evaluated.
| Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Qualified 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discussion Forum Postings | Displays little understanding of web 2.0 tools and their applicability to real world scenarios. Examples are incoherent or missing entirely. | Displays a moderate understanding of web 2.0 tools and their applicability. Limited to no examples provided. | Displays a good understanding of web 2.0 tools and their applicability. Limited to no examples provided. | Excellent articulation of web 2.0 tools and their applicability to real world scenarios. Supports reflection with relevant examples. | |
| Designing relevant activities (Voicethread) |
Little understanding of the use of the tool. Little variety in activities. Displays 4 examples ranging in a few levels of thinking skills. | Moderate understanding of the use of the tool. Activities are similar. Displays 4 examples ranging in a few levels of thinking skills. | Good understanding of the use of the tool. Activities are diverse. Displays 4 examples ranging in a few levels of thinking skills. | Evidence of clear understanding of the use of the tool. Activities are diverse. Displays 4 examples ranging in various levels of thinking skill. | |
| Developing criteria for selection of web 2.0 tools | Displays 2 or less criteria. No evidence of reflection. Reports on features of the tool. No examples provided. | Displays less than 5 relevant criteria. Limited evidence of reflection. Reports on features of the tool. Limited to no examples provided. | Displays 5 relevant criteria for selection. Evidence of reflection and articulation of the tool. Limited to no examples provided. | Displays 5 or more relevant criteria for selection. Evidence of strong reflective thought pertaining to the tool. Supports with relevant examples. | |
| Total |
